This article examines precedent phenomena which fixed values of English linguoculture. In the course of the research of precedent phenomenon of English linguoculture space national and transnational precedent phenomena were identified. The national precedent phenomena based on phenomenon of cultural life, literature, history, politics and language units. The transnational precedent phenomena based on phenomenon of antique mythology, world classical literature, religion.

In this article the religious questions of works of Mashur Zhusup Kopev are analysed.

The article deals with religion, including Islam, which does not impose restrictions on obtaining knowledge. A learned person must keep up the pace of life in the contemporary world. Therefore, it is necessary to be able to manage the time given in youth correctly; try to get an education, to find a way to the mastery of a profession. The younger generation should strive to introduce modern technology.

he article presents the results of research on the idea of «conceptosphere» in modern science. The main emphasis is placed on the semantic spheres represented by the meanings of words in the language. The authors conclude how much is the culture of a nation, its folklore, literature, science, fine art, historical experience, and religion is rich, so the concept sphere of the people is richer. In addition, the concept sphere of a person is a field of knowledge made up of concepts as its units. There are reflected the sources of the conceptual unit of ideas from which the world view of the language speaker is formed. The article analyzes the main trends of concepts that form the concept sphere, which enter into correlating relationships, hierarchies with other concepts by their individual characteristics.The specific nature of the system relations of concepts requires research, but the General principle of systematicity undoubtedly applies to the national conceptual sphere, as thinking itself presupposes the categorization of thought objects, and categorization presupposes the ordering of its objects.The article summarizes the conceptual system, which should be considered in terms of mental representations, mental lexicon, and the language of thought that are part of it. The term «cognitive space» also defines an individual cognitive space – a structured set of knowledge and ideas that has any lingual person, every speaker. In their work, the authors highlight the collective cognitive space, represented by a structured set of knowledge and ideas that must be possessed by all individuals belonging to a particul ar society. Attention is paid to the distinction between the concept sphere and the semantic space of the language. According to the authors’opinions, the concept sphere presupposes the existence of a mental sphere. The mental sphere consists of concepts that exist in the form of concepts, diagrams, gestalts, mental pictures, frames, scenarios. The semantic space of a language is that part of the concept sphere that is expressed by means of language signs. The semantic space of language is the subject of co gnitive linguistics research due to the fact that most of the conceptosphere of the human ethnos is represented within the semantic space of language.

ing the image of a dog. The purpose of this study is to consider the national and cultural specifics, reflected in the stable expressions of the English and Kazakh languages with the "dog" component. The article provides a brief overview of works related to the issues of phraseology in English and Kazakh. The work was based on general scientific methods: induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis. The work with the collected card index of stable expressions was carried out by the method of continuous sampling, using the descriptive-analytical method. An important place in the work with the material was given to the Вестник Инновационного Евразийского университета. 2020. № 4 ISSN 1729-536X 17 methods of definitional, contextual and typological analysis. Using the comparative-comparative method, national-specific and universal features of zoonyms in English and Kazakh languages were determined. The material of the research was a card index of phraseological units of the English and Kazakh languages (more than 160 units) which were selected using the method of continuous sampling from phraseological dictionaries of the English and Kazakh languages. When analyzing the authors of the article relied on materials from phraseological dictionaries in English and Kazakh languages. In the course of the analysis, groups of phraseological units were identified and their differences and similarities in the compared languages were identified, as well as their national and cultural specificity, based on the action of universal cultural codes; the national and cultural specificity of zoonyms is determined by a number of extralinguistic factors: the location of the country, the living conditions of the people, their customs and traditions, history, religion and socio-political structure. All this secures national-specific connotation to zoonyms and determines their productivity. The results of the study showed that through the prism of axiology, an analysis of English and Kazakh stable combinations with the "dog" component, reflecting the paradigm of values (general cultural and national-cultural) and anti-values of the corresponding ethnic communities, was presented, as well as universal values representing at the intercultural level. The results of the study showed that through the prism of axiology, the analysis reflects the paradigm of values (general cultural and national-cultural) and anti-values of the corresponding ethnic communities. The research results have both theoretical and practical significance; it will be additional material for elective courses on the subject of "Lexicology" taught at the faculties of philology and foreign languages in higher educational institutions.

The article examines in detail the role of the concept of al-muhalafa in making judgments from religious texts and other legal grounds. In addition, a comparative analysis of the legal and linguistic principles and features of the Hanafi and Mutakallim schools of Islamic law, as well as issues of disagreement between the two movements, will be considered. There is much debate among scholars as to whether Mafhum al-Muqhalafa is accepted as evidence. Even Abdul Aziz Bukhari said: "This issue occupies a large place in the science of jurisprudence," he said. That is, below we answer the question of how much influence the evidence from this principle has on the verdict and whether these sentences are legitimate. The principle of Mafhum al-Mukhalafa is not accepted as evidence in the Hanafi Madhhab, and the ruling resulting from it is invalid. This is because the concept of al-muhalaf is to render a verdict that contradicts the verdict in the text (Amidi), confirming a verdict that is not in the text, that is, according to Abu Hanifa, the verdict in the text and the verdict that does not appear in the text are not equal. However, in schools other than Hanafi schools, this principle fully applies. The authors used the method of comparative analysis of the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet, which are the basis of Islam, to prove your point Some scholars of the Hanafi Madhhab do not completely refute this principle. It is unacceptable to judge by this principle only by Sharia texts, but in everyday life, in communication with people, the concept of al-muhalaf is accepted as proof. Ibn al-Humam reports that the Hanafis do not recognize the concept of al-muhalyaf as proof only in Sharia texts. Therefore, scientists are divided into two main groups regarding the application of this principle as evidence, and each group has its own strong arguments, which are discussed in detail in the second part of the article.