his article discusses the concept, essence and purpose of judicial control over the execution of criminal penalties , as a special type of state control, its independent and important role in public administration among the ways to ensure the rule of law.

The article describes in detail the civil proceedings, the General characteristics of the participants of the process, the classification of persons involved in the case, the order of their participation in the proceedings, as well as their rights and obligations. Civil procedure is a system of legal norms regulating civil procedural actions and legal relations formed between the court and other participants of the process in the administration of justice in civil cases. The main purpose of this production is restoration of the violated right and protection o f interests protected by the law. Procedural actions shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure and strict procedure established by law. On the basis of the procedure established by law at all stages of the process, civil procedural relations arise, develop and cease.

In this article the religious questions of works of Mashur Zhusup Kopev are analysed.

In the present article the understanding of the lawfulness in a legal state isconsidered . In particular, the author notes that legality is the main principle of the rule of law. In addition, it is noted that the precise implementation of democratic laws entails the implementation of other legally enshrined principles, such as: separation of powers, democracy, sovereignty of the people, recognition and guarantee of human rights, etc. The author concludes that at present, the idea of a legal state, as applied to the Republic of Kazakhstan, is in the phase of its implementation.

The article discusses the concept of civil law, its application in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The application of civil legislation throughout the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the application of civil legislation by analogy, unless otherwise provided by law. Attention is paid to the main sources of civil law and the application of existing civil law in the space

The right of ownership, like property itself, occupies one of the mainplaces in public life. Statutory regulation of property relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan existed throughout the entire period of statehood formation. Today, property relations are regulated by the norms of various branches of law. But civil law regulation occupies one of the most important places in the system of regulatory regulation. This article deals with a comprehensive analysis of the main legal concepts, such as property, owner, subject of property rights, as well as forms and types of property, the grounds for the emergence and termination of property rights and ways to protect and protect the absolute right of the owner. A certain thing may belong to several persons as common property. In this case, the right of ownership is distributed among several owners (co-owners). The totality of legal norms on common property forms the institution of common property law. The purpose of this work is a comprehensive analysis of the main legal concepts, such as property, owner and subject of property rights, as well as forms and types of property, the basis for the emergence and termination of property rights and the definition of ways to protect and protect the absolute right of the owner. The means of achieving this goal is the study of the works of Kazakh legal scholars, the study of the analysis of practical materials. The article uses the following methods: comparative-legal, system-structural, formal-logical, as well as the method of system analysis. The legislation of Kazakhstan provides for two subjects of State property that have the right to act on their own behalf: the Republic of Kazakhstan as a whole (in respect of property constituting republican property) and the administrative – territorial unit (in respect of property constituting municipal property). That is, in civil circulation, data are carriers of state property rights. Depending on the tasks performed, the State exercises the powers of the owner on behalf of one of the specified entities. The Republic of Kazakhstan and the administrative-territorial unit are not legal entities. However, unless otherwise provided by legislative acts, they are subject to the rules governing the participation of legal entities in relations regulated by civil law. The state and administrative-territorial unit, as special subjects, have all the rights ofsubjects of civil legal relations and are limited in legal personality only by the current legislation.

In this article, the authors consider the features of the scope of application of labor legislation. The authors note that the extent to which the norms of labor legislation apply to different types of labor relations varies. In this connection, the question of the scope of labor legislation, as well as the limits of its use in the settlement of labor relations of various categories of citizens, becomes relevant. The purpose of this article is to address issues related to the scope of application of labor legislation. In this study, the methods generally accepted in the legal science and the science of labor law is used. Thus, such general scientific methods as dialectical, system-structural, historical methods, as well as the method of comparative analysis were used. Among the special legal methods used, it is necessary to distinguish the formal legal method of scientific knowledge. The scope of the labor legislation is, first of all, the circle of public relations, a certain territory, as well as the circle of subjects to which its norms apply. The Labor Code cannot regulate all relations concerning the exercise of the right to work. This is the sphere of regulation of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Labor legislation can regulate only those relations concerning the exercise of the right to work that arise on the basis of an employment contract. The authors come to the conclusion that labor legislation regulates not only labor relations, which are the subject of labor law. It also regulates certain other types of employment relations in cases where this is expressly provided for by law. At the same time, it should be noted that the labor legislation applies to other types of labor relations only within the limits defined by a special law. Labor legislation does not apply in cases where the work is performed by an individual – a business entity independently or the work is performed by members of a personal peasant farm in this farm, as well as in cases where an individual performs the duties of a member of the supervisory board of a joint-stock company, the executive body of a business company, or other relevant management bodies of legal entities; if these duties are performed on other grounds than an employment contract, and if an individual performs the duties under a civil contract providing for the performance of certain work in favor of the other party to the contract.

In the Republic of Kazakhstan a market economy, a democratic political system and a free civil society based on ideological, social and political pluralism are developing. This contributes to the development of constitutional norms and the diversity of new legal institutions that ensure the supremacy of the Constitution. These include the constitutional Council. In 2020, it's been twenty-five years from the date of adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the creation of the constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan, ensuring the supremacy of the Constitution throughout the territory of the Republic. The constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan is not part of any of the three branches of government and is subject only to the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the law. The purpose of this article is a comprehensive analysis of theoretical and practical issues of interaction between the constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan and other institutions of state power. In this regard, the article contains the results of the analysis of the foundations of the constitutional system of the Republic; constitutional supervision of the prosecutor's office; the institution, functions and instruments of power of the President, mechanisms of interaction of the Constitutional Council as a constitutional supervisory body with the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. A comprehensive study of the activities of the constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the constitutionalization of current legislation is one of the current theoretical and practical problems. It is determined by the scale and quality of the current legislation adopted during the period of fundamental social reforms, the need to «correct» and improve it. In this regard, a significant role is assigned to the Constitutional Council, whose activities are subject to scientific analysis and reflection. In addition, the authors studied and revealed the line of interaction of the constitutional Council and other government institutions are considered in the areas of initiation of constitutional proceedings in the Council, organisational, legal, information procedures, determine the composition of the constitutional Council, overcoming the objections of the President to the constitutional Council's decision. The institutional method used in the article made it possible to show the essence and significance of the constitutional Council in the system of state authorities

The article examines in detail the role of the concept of al-muhalafa in making judgments from religious texts and other legal grounds. In addition, a comparative analysis of the legal and linguistic principles and features of the Hanafi and Mutakallim schools of Islamic law, as well as issues of disagreement between the two movements, will be considered. There is much debate among scholars as to whether Mafhum al-Muqhalafa is accepted as evidence. Even Abdul Aziz Bukhari said: "This issue occupies a large place in the science of jurisprudence," he said. That is, below we answer the question of how much influence the evidence from this principle has on the verdict and whether these sentences are legitimate. The principle of Mafhum al-Mukhalafa is not accepted as evidence in the Hanafi Madhhab, and the ruling resulting from it is invalid. This is because the concept of al-muhalaf is to render a verdict that contradicts the verdict in the text (Amidi), confirming a verdict that is not in the text, that is, according to Abu Hanifa, the verdict in the text and the verdict that does not appear in the text are not equal. However, in schools other than Hanafi schools, this principle fully applies. The authors used the method of comparative analysis of the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet, which are the basis of Islam, to prove your point Some scholars of the Hanafi Madhhab do not completely refute this principle. It is unacceptable to judge by this principle only by Sharia texts, but in everyday life, in communication with people, the concept of al-muhalaf is accepted as proof. Ibn al-Humam reports that the Hanafis do not recognize the concept of al-muhalyaf as proof only in Sharia texts. Therefore, scientists are divided into two main groups regarding the application of this principle as evidence, and each group has its own strong arguments, which are discussed in detail in the second part of the article.

The sphere of taxation, ensuring the implementation by the state of the first stage of public financial activity is the mobilization of public funds, is the subject of close attention of scientists and increased public interest. The processes of tax reform taking place in the Republic of Kazakhstan show the dynamics of tax and legal regulation, implement a number of international standards in the field of tax relations, which cause an urgent need for theoretical understanding and thorough generalization, analysis and evaluation of new or significantly changed institutions of tax law. Tax administration has a procedural nature, which reflects the dynamics and statics of tax legal relations. From the standpoint of statics, tax administration is a set of all tax procedures provided for by tax legislation aimed at ensuring the receipt of tax payments to the relevant budgets. The purpose of the study is to determine the legal regulation of the procedures for fulfilling the obligation to pay taxes and fees by individuals and legal entities in the Republic of Kazakhstan by clarifying their legal nature, and bringing to administrative responsibility for non-fulfillment of this obligation. The methodological basis of the research is based on modern methods of cognition: dialectical, formal-logical, historical, comparative-legal, analytical-synthetic, system-structural, logical-legal. The article describes the legal regulation of the fulfillment of the obligation to pay taxes and fees in the Republic of Kazakhstan from the standpoint of statics (as a set of all tax procedures provided for by tax legislation, aimed at ensuring the receipt of tax payments to the relevant budgets) and dynamics (as the activities of relevant entities for the implementation of tax procedures). A distinction has been made between tax administration in a broad and narrow sense as: tax administration, which includes the whole set of procedures, including bringing to administrative responsibility for non–payment of taxes, as well as procedures for resolving tax conflicts in the mode of administrative coordination and in court; administration of tax payment - procedures for the payment of taxes and fees, the result of the implementation of which is aimed at all tax activities of the state, which ensures the actual receipt of funds to the budgets. The article also discusses a number of features of bringing legal entities to administrative responsibility for non-payment of taxes, within the framework of administrative proceedings.

This study examines the problematic issues of improving labor legislation. At the present stage of development of market transformations in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as taking into account the entry of the Republic of Kazakhstan into the Eurasian Economic Union, the problems of reforming labor legislation are of crucial importance. This necessitated the emergence of new views on the legal regulation of public relations in the field of the realization of the right to work. In this regard, it becomes urgent to rethink many fundamental provisions of labor law, and among them, not the last place is occupied by the problems of improving labor legislation in various areas of labor relations in a market economy. At the present stage of development of the Republic of Kazakhstan, labor legislation should guarantee the implementation of a wide range of not only labor, but also other socio-economic and personal rights and freedoms. Despite the relative research, the study of issues of further improvement of labor legislation does not lose its relevance, taking into account the fact that both the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in general and labor legislation in particular are constantly developing and need further development and improvement. The purpose of the study is a comprehensive study of the current state of the labor legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the definition of the main directions of its improvement in the light of the protection of labor rights. The methodological basis of the research is based on modern methods of cognition: dialectical, formally logical, historical, comparative legal, analytical-synthetic, system-structural, logical-legal. The article substantiates the need for new theoretical and methodological approaches to the consideration of the main directions of improving the labor legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, in connection with which, there is an urgent need to study labor legislation, which is designed to ensure the labor rights of man and citizen, from the perspective of its further improvement. The concept of improving labor legislation is defined, which refers to the activities of the competent authorities of the state to support its qualitative state in accordance with the needs of the development of labor and closely related relations, which is aimed at ensuring the effectiveness of legal regulation of these relations.