Analysis of use of information resources is directly connected with the formation and evaluation of system of indicators of organizational and structural capabilities, material and technical level of ensuring information activities, information capacity of personnel, the quality of information provision of administrative activity.

This article describes the features and principles of the civil service system in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as international experience to create an effective state apparatus by the example of South Korea.

The issue of being provided with the information for achieving the professional and life goals and strategies by the employees are considered in the article

The article is focused on the competency-based approach to the training of akims of rural districts on the basis of the best practice of Pavlodar center for retraining and advanced training of civil servants.

The cities folded in foreign countries distinguish three organizational models of branding. First model – administrative – here, forming of brand of territory the public and local organs of power take the lead. Second organizational model – branding is initiated by business and divided into two types. First type – "export", according to this variant the basic task of municipal brand consists in stimulation of sales of commodities and services of local producers. Second type – "import", this variant of business model is branding on purpose to attract (to import) new business and investments in a city. The third model of organization of branding – civil is implies that realization of branding is initiated by different public associations or separate interested citizens. All three variants of branding befit the Kazakhstan cities and territorial educations, but priority direction will become is the European model with participation administration.

The right of ownership, like property itself, occupies one of the mainplaces in public life. Statutory regulation of property relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan existed throughout the entire period of statehood formation. Today, property relations are regulated by the norms of various branches of law. But civil law regulation occupies one of the most important places in the system of regulatory regulation. This article deals with a comprehensive analysis of the main legal concepts, such as property, owner, subject of property rights, as well as forms and types of property, the grounds for the emergence and termination of property rights and ways to protect and protect the absolute right of the owner. A certain thing may belong to several persons as common property. In this case, the right of ownership is distributed among several owners (co-owners). The totality of legal norms on common property forms the institution of common property law. The purpose of this work is a comprehensive analysis of the main legal concepts, such as property, owner and subject of property rights, as well as forms and types of property, the basis for the emergence and termination of property rights and the definition of ways to protect and protect the absolute right of the owner. The means of achieving this goal is the study of the works of Kazakh legal scholars, the study of the analysis of practical materials. The article uses the following methods: comparative-legal, system-structural, formal-logical, as well as the method of system analysis. The legislation of Kazakhstan provides for two subjects of State property that have the right to act on their own behalf: the Republic of Kazakhstan as a whole (in respect of property constituting republican property) and the administrative – territorial unit (in respect of property constituting municipal property). That is, in civil circulation, data are carriers of state property rights. Depending on the tasks performed, the State exercises the powers of the owner on behalf of one of the specified entities. The Republic of Kazakhstan and the administrative-territorial unit are not legal entities. However, unless otherwise provided by legislative acts, they are subject to the rules governing the participation of legal entities in relations regulated by civil law. The state and administrative-territorial unit, as special subjects, have all the rights ofsubjects of civil legal relations and are limited in legal personality only by the current legislation.

Local self-government bodies are an integral mechanism of the foundation of a democratic state. In the modern system of public relations, one of the most important places is occupied by general economic relations, namely local self-government. Without a developed system of local self-government, legislative and real opportunities, it is very difficult to independently create market-democratic structures to solve economic, social, domestic, cultural and other issues at the local level. Local self-government bodies are a special level of government, which combines two principles: public and state. In the practice of Constitutional and administrative law, it is important to determine the place and nature of local self-government and to establish balanced relations between State authorities and self-government bodies, on the one hand, with local representative offices and structures. The purpose of the article isto study the role and place of local self-government in modern society, to develop practical recommendations on the formation and prospects for the development of local authorities in Kazakhstan. When writing an article, the following methods are used: description, analysis and synthesis, justification, logical modeling, system analysis, etc. When studying the formation of local self-government, as well as the functional management system, the method of structural and analytical analysis was used. The conclusions and recommendations obtained as a result of the conducted research can be used: in the practical activities of maslikhats and akimats of the Republic of Kazakhstan, civil servants; in the process of studying at courses in higher educational institutions, as well as for further general theoretical and applied research.

The sphere of taxation, ensuring the implementation by the state of the first stage of public financial activity is the mobilization of public funds, is the subject of close attention of scientists and increased public interest. The processes of tax reform taking place in the Republic of Kazakhstan show the dynamics of tax and legal regulation, implement a number of international standards in the field of tax relations, which cause an urgent need for theoretical understanding and thorough generalization, analysis and evaluation of new or significantly changed institutions of tax law. Tax administration has a procedural nature, which reflects the dynamics and statics of tax legal relations. From the standpoint of statics, tax administration is a set of all tax procedures provided for by tax legislation aimed at ensuring the receipt of tax payments to the relevant budgets. The purpose of the study is to determine the legal regulation of the procedures for fulfilling the obligation to pay taxes and fees by individuals and legal entities in the Republic of Kazakhstan by clarifying their legal nature, and bringing to administrative responsibility for non-fulfillment of this obligation. The methodological basis of the research is based on modern methods of cognition: dialectical, formal-logical, historical, comparative-legal, analytical-synthetic, system-structural, logical-legal. The article describes the legal regulation of the fulfillment of the obligation to pay taxes and fees in the Republic of Kazakhstan from the standpoint of statics (as a set of all tax procedures provided for by tax legislation, aimed at ensuring the receipt of tax payments to the relevant budgets) and dynamics (as the activities of relevant entities for the implementation of tax procedures). A distinction has been made between tax administration in a broad and narrow sense as: tax administration, which includes the whole set of procedures, including bringing to administrative responsibility for non–payment of taxes, as well as procedures for resolving tax conflicts in the mode of administrative coordination and in court; administration of tax payment - procedures for the payment of taxes and fees, the result of the implementation of which is aimed at all tax activities of the state, which ensures the actual receipt of funds to the budgets. The article also discusses a number of features of bringing legal entities to administrative responsibility for non-payment of taxes, within the framework of administrative proceedings.

Main problem: local self-government bodies are an integral mechanism of the foundation of a democratic state. In the modern system of public relations, one of the most important places is occupied by general economic relations, namely local self-government. Without a developed system of local self-government, legislative and real opportunities, it is very difficult to independently create market-democratic structures to solve economic, social, domestic, cultural and other issues at the local level. Local self-government bodies are a special level of government, which combines two principles: public and state. In the practice of Constitutional and administrative law, it is important to determine the place and nature of local self-government and to establish balanced relations between State authorities and self-government bodies, on the one hand, with local representative offices and structures. Purpose: to study the role and place of local self-government in modern society, to develop practical recommendations on the formation and prospects for the development of local authorities in Kazakhstan. Methods: when writing an article, the following methods are used: description, analysis and synthesis, justification, logical modeling, system analysis, etc. When studying the formation of local self-government, as well as the functional management system, the method of structural and analytical analysis was used. The results and their significance: the conclusions and recommendations obtained as a result of the conducted research can be used: in the practical activities of maslikhats and akimats of the Republic of Kazakhstan, civil servants; in the process of studying at courses in higher educational institutions, as well as for further general theoretical and applied research.

The relevance of this article is that the impact of human economic activity on the natural environment is becoming comparable in scale to geological factors. In this regard, the importance of protecting the biosphere has increased immeasurably. The earth is the only common home of all earthlings. Society, including us, cannot help but worry that the planet has approached a critical ecological threshold. The main goal of the research that we set for ourselves in this article is to create a predictive model for overcoming the environmental crisis in the following areas: environmental education, greening technologies, administrative and legal direction, international cooperation. To achieve the result, we tried to process as much information as possible, analyze the situation, draw appropriate conclusions and propose our own model for overcoming the environmental crisis. The hypothesis is that environmental pollution, improper disposal of household and industrial waste, and poor environmental culture have a detrimental effect on the ecology of the city, poisoning the environment and public health. The main research methods used were methods of empirical knowledge - these are observations, survey methods, questionnaires, as well as theoretical methods. The results of these studies can be used to inform the population about the impact of waste on human health, as well as the importance of storing, recycling and obtaining secondary raw materials, in order to reduce the amount of garbage on city streets. And also about the existence of unauthorized waste collection sites and administrative responsibility for the creation of such landfills in the city and in the surrounding area, this is an educational activity in all areas of education, starting from preschool institutions, the media, advertising agencies, NGOs, environmental authorities and also, using international experience, in the construction of a solid waste processing plant in his hometown.

The article provides a comparative legal analysis of the constitutional statuses of the Presidents of the Republic of Kazakhstan (ROK) and the United States. The study was conducted according to the relevant provisions of the Constitution of the studied countries and according to the criteria: form of placement; form of government; presidential elections and powers; censorship established for presidential candidates, etc. The peculiarities of the legal status of the institution of the presidency of these countries were noted, including the following issues: participation in the formation of the upper house of the Parliament, ministries and other government bodies; interaction with the Parliament and judicial branches of the Government; powers in the field of defense and security; international relations; lawmaking, etc. Purpose: to reveal the content of the legal status of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, to reveal the doctrinal, specific, normative legal status of the head of state, to analyze the features of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, his normative and actual status. The article evaluates the constitutional and legal status of the President of Kazakhstan in relation to the administrative and legal status, analyzes the status positions of the ‘President’ as the head of the state and the highest official performing the functions of public administration in the context of constitutional foundations. Methodology: the methodological basis of the research as well as the work is based on a set of scientific methods of phenomena cognition: comparative Jurisprudence, the method of dogmatic analysis of legal acts, etc., which made it possible to identify the problems of the constitutional and legal status of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, to establish the fact of combining elements of the super-presidential form of the government. The results and their significance: therefore, based on the results of a comparison between the presidential institutions of the United States and Kazakhstan, the right to address the Parliament, the participation of the Senate in the appointment, approval, election of officials proposed by the President, the right of veto, the General Command of the Armed Forces, one person cannot be a president for more than two consecutive terms.