Annotation: The main problem in the field under study is the inefficiency of the existing control over the implementation of migration legislation in Russia. This is manifested in the insufficient coordination of actions by various state bodies, the presence of corruption, the lack of resources for effective monitoring of migration processes, as well as the imperfection of existing information systems. All this leads to violations of the rights of migrants, the emergence of illegal migration, and a decrease in security levels. The goal of this research is to analyze the current state of migration legislation and the control over its implementation in Russia, as well as to identify the problems that hinder effective regulation of migration processes. Within this goal, the task is also set to develop proposals for improving the control system, enhancing cooperation between various state bodies, and implementing modern technologies. To achieve the set goal, methods of analyzing normative acts, statistical data, as well as comparative analysis of migration legislation in Russia and other countries were used. Systemic analysis methods were applied to identify the shortcomings of the current control system, and legal analysis methods were used to assess the effectiveness of existing mechanisms. During the research, monitoring and analysis of the work of state bodies involved in migration control were also conducted. The results of the study showed that migration legislation control in Russia faces a number of significant problems, including the inefficiency of information systems, insufficient staffing and financial resources, as well as the lack of proper coordination between various state bodies. One of the key issues is the high level of illegal migration and labor activity by migrants without official permits. An important result was the proposal to introduce innovative technologies to improve control, as well as strengthen cooperation between the prosecutor's office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and other state bodies. These recommendations can significantly increase the effectiveness of monitoring migration processes, improve safety and legal protection of citizens, and also contribute to the better integration of legal migrants into Russian society.

Annotation: In Kazakhstan, a high level of corruption is observed, which significantly harms social and economic processes. Combating corruption requires a comprehensive approach, including anticorruption education, the development of public oversight, enhancing the digitalization of government processes, and creating effective mechanisms for protecting whistleblowers. Despite the measures taken, the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies remains a topic of discussion, as the existing approaches often prove insufficient. The goal is to explore modern strategies for forming an anti-corruption culture in Kazakhstan, assess the challenges and prospects of anti-corruption education, public oversight, and the digitalization of government processes. Furthermore, it aims to propose ways to improve anticorruption policies through the development of educational programs, strengthening the role of NGOs and media, and introducing whistleblower protection mechanisms. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on the experience of anti-corruption education and public oversight in Kazakhstan and abroad, as well as sociological data. Methods such as content analysis, comparative analysis of legislation, and analysis of statistics on corruption violations were applied. The process of forming an anti-corruption culture in Kazakhstan can be divided into several key areas: anti-corruption education, the development of public oversight, enhancing the role of media, and effective protection of whistleblowers. The research highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach that combines legal, educational, and social measures. An important conclusion is the need to change the approach to anti-corruption education, improve mechanisms for protecting rights defenders and whistleblowers, and further strengthen the digitalization of government processes, which will increase public trust in state institutions.

Annotation: In the context of digitalization and changes in the labor market in the Republic of Kazakhstan, there is a need to reform the regulation of labor relations. The country faces a number of problems, such as a high level of informal employment, frequent violations of labor rights, as well as insufficient legal protection for small business workers, freelancers, and self-employed individuals. The impact of digital technologies on the labor market requires the adaptation of legislation to new forms of employment, making the regulation of labor relations a relevant issue. The goal is to study the issues of regulating labor relations in Kazakhstan in the context of digitalization, assess the impact of new technologies on the labor market, and propose ways to improve labor legislation by creating new legal norms for remote work, protecting the rights of selfemployed individuals, and introducing digital mechanisms for the protection of labor rights. A comprehensive analysis was conducted of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, international experience in regulating labor relations in the EU, the USA, and South Korea, as well as judicial practices and statistics on labor disputes. Methods of content analysis, comparative legal analysis, and analysis of data on current labor market issues were used. The results of the study highlight the need to adapt labor legislation to current conditions, including remote work and self-employment. International labor rights protection mechanisms, such as flexible labor contracts and electronic systems for resolving labor disputes, were considered. The study proposed recommendations for improving labor legislation, including the development of new legal norms for remote work and the creation of social guarantees for self-employed individuals. The implementation of digital mechanisms for the protection of labor rights will positively affect the development of the labor market in Kazakhstan and improve the social protection of workers.

Annotation: Constitutional guarantees of the legal status of individuals and citizens in the Republic of Kazakhstan, despite the presence of formal legal norms, face challenges in their implementation in real practice. The main difficulties lie in the imperfection of law enforcement practices, insufficient legal awareness among the population, as well as limitations arising from the political situation and institutional barriers. The aim of the study is to analyze the current constitutional guarantees of the legal status of individuals and citizens in Kazakhstan, identify existing problems in their implementation, and propose ways to improve the human rights situation in the country. The research employed an analysis of legal and normative acts, such as the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as international human rights documents. The methodological basis of the study is the comparative legal method to analyze international practice and normative-legal analysis of Kazakhstan's current legislation. Sociological research was also used to analyze the perception of citizens' rights and freedoms in real life. The results of the study showed that, despite the presence of a broad range of rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, there are significant issues with their implementation in practice. The main issues include the imperfection of law enforcement practices, insufficient legal awareness of citizens, and the limited effectiveness of human rights bodies, such as the Ombudsman. It was also found that the political situation in the country affects freedom of expression and civic participation, limiting the full realization of citizens' rights. These results highlight the importance of improving the human rights protection system and the mechanism for implementing rights and freedoms. Enhancing legal literacy among the population, improving law enforcement practices, and strengthening institutional work in the field of human rights protection are essential steps for improving the legal protection of citizens in Kazakhstan. The importance of these results lies in the fact that they not only help understand the existing problems but also suggest ways to resolve them, which will contribute to improving the legal status of individuals and citizens in the country and increasing citizens' trust in state institutions.

Annotation: The main problem of the administrative responsibility institute in Kazakhstan is the insufficient differentiation of punishments and the uncertainty in the application of administrative sanctions. This leads to an overload of the judicial system and complicates the implementation of the principle of proportionality of punishment. Additionally, there is a low level of legal awareness and legal culture among citizens, which negatively affects the effectiveness of administrative responsibility. The purpose of this article is to analyze the development paths of the administrative responsibility institute in Kazakhstan, identify existing problems, and propose solutions to improve legislation and the practice of applying administrative sanctions. This includes increasing the differentiation of punishments, improving the enforcement mechanisms for sanctions, and enhancing the legal literacy of the population. Comparative, historical-legal, systemic, and regulatory-legal approaches were used to analyze the legislation, its development, and application in judicial practice. The analysis revealed several key problems, such as insufficient differentiation of punishments, uncertainty in the application of sanctions, and a low level of legal awareness among the population. These issues require a comprehensive approach to resolve, including continued reform of the regulatory framework, the introduction of alternative punishment measures, and strengthening educational initiatives. The significance of these results lies in their potential to improve the effectiveness of administrative responsibility, enhance citizens' legal consciousness, and ease the workload of judicial and law enforcement agencies. Improving the administrative responsibility institute in Kazakhstan contributes to strengthening the rule of law, increasing trust in government institutions, and improving the socio-economic situation in the country.

Annotation: Conflicts of interest in medicine represent a serious and multifaceted issue that affects the quality of medical care and patients' trust in the healthcare system. These conflicts can arise from personal or commercial interests of healthcare professionals, potentially leading to distorted professional decisions and violations of ethical standards. Тhe aim of the research is to explore the psychological aspects of conflicts of interest in medicine and their criminological significance, as well as to analyze their impact on the professional activities of physicians and the legal consequences of such situations. To achieve this goal, qualitative methods of analysis were employed, including a literature review, analysis of scientific and legal publications, and the examination of real cases where conflicts of interest led to legal consequences. The study results show that conflicts of interest in medicine can manifest in both explicit and hidden forms, often remaining unnoticed by healthcare professionals. The influence of financial and corporate interests on decision-making may jeopardize patient health and result in legal consequences, including charges of corruption and fraud. These findings emphasize the importance of developing effective preventive and control measures for conflicts of interest, as well as ensuring the adherence to ethical and legal standards in medical practice. This will help prevent decision-making distortions, guarantee high-quality medical care, and preserve patients' trust in the healthcare system.

Annotation: The main problem addressed in the article is the limited effectiveness of human rights protection mechanisms in Kazakhstan, despite the presence of constitutional guarantees of citizens' rights and freedoms. The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan provides citizens with broad rights, but there is a significant gap between legal guarantees and their actual implementation in practice. The main issues include the insufficient independence of the judiciary, restrictions on freedom of expression, limited access to justice and legal aid for citizens, as well as difficulties faced by human rights organizations. These issues hinder the full realization of citizens' rights and freedoms, creating significant barriers to the functioning of the rule of law. The goal of the article is to analyze the human rights protection mechanisms enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and assess their impact on the protection of citizens' rights. The article aims to identify the main problems faced by citizens when protecting their rights and suggest possible solutions to improve the human rights situation in the country. To achieve the research goal, legal analysis of normative acts was used, including the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and other legislative acts regulating citizens' rights and freedoms. Judicial acts, reports of human rights organizations, and statistics related to citizens' appeals to state authorities and human rights structures were also used. The research methodology included comparative analysis and case studies, which allowed a deeper examination of the real problems in the implementation of human rights in Kazakhstan and the proposal of well-grounded solutions to address these issues. The research results showed that, despite the presence of constitutional guarantees of rights and freedoms, the real situation with human rights protection mechanisms in Kazakhstan remains problematic. The main problems include the insufficient independence of the judiciary, restrictions on freedom of expression, difficulties in accessing justice and legal aid, as well as administrative barriers for human rights organizations. These factors limit the effective realization of citizens' rights and undermine trust in the judiciary and state authorities. The task of reforming the judicial system, improving the accessibility of legal aid, and creating conditions for the free operation of human rights organizations is of critical importance for enhancing human rights protection, strengthening democracy, and the rule of law, as well as for creating a fairer and more effective human rights protection system in Kazakhstan.

Annotation: The main issue addressed in the article is the question of the applicability of criminal law over time and space. This issue covers several aspects: first, issues related to the retroactive effect of criminal law, its application in retrospect, and the relationship between the principles of legality and justice; second, issues concerning the application of criminal law on the international stage, problems of extradition, human rights, and legal conflicts arising from the interaction of different legal systems in a globalized world. The article also discusses issues related to international cooperation in criminal justice and the application of law to actions committed beyond the borders of one country. The objective of the article is to analyze the main problems of legal regulation regarding the application of criminal law over time and space, as well as to propose possible solutions to these problems. The task of the article is to identify the key problems arising in the application of criminal legislation and propose recommendations for improving the legal mechanisms that ensure fair and effective justice in the context of globalization and changing social relations. To achieve the goal, several methods were used in the research. The main methods were comparative, analytical, and legal. The comparative method allowed for the study of different approaches to regulating the issue of the applicability of criminal law in different countries, revealing differences in national legal systems. The analytical method was used to examine judicial practice and to identify key problems arising from the application of criminal law over time and space. The legal method was used to analyze current legislative norms and international conventions, as well as to assess their effectiveness in the context of legal conflicts and human rights. The research results show that the main problems in the application of criminal law over time are related to the difficulty of balancing the principles of legality and justice, especially in the context of its retroactive effect. Issues concerning the application of criminal law over space are also relevant, particularly in light of the rise in transnational crime and the need for international cooperation. At the same time, the key issues are extradition, human rights, and the protection of citizens in international jurisdictions. Problems of legal conflicts between different legal systems also remain significant, especially in the context of globalization and the mobility of citizens. The significance of these results lies in the fact that they contribute to a deeper understanding of the legal and ethical issues that arise when applying criminal law in modern conditions. Recommendations for improving international cooperation, legal mechanisms for extradition, and the legal protection of the accused can help create a fairer and more effective legal system capable of accounting for changes in social conditions and international realities.

Annotation: In Kazakhstan, there is an increase in crime, which is related to various social, economic, and technological factors. In the face of contemporary challenges, a comprehensive approach to combating crime is required, including the implementation of digital technologies, the tightening of criminal legislation, strengthening international cooperation, and the creation of specialized units to combat cybercrime. Despite the efforts of law enforcement agencies, the effectiveness of the measures taken remains a subject of debate. To study the current measures to combat crime in Kazakhstan, assess their effectiveness, and propose ways to improve law enforcement activities through the implementation of innovative technologies, enhancing international cooperation, and strengthening preventive measures. A comprehensive analysis of literature on crime control issues, judicial practice, crime statistics, as well as the opinions of criminologists and legal scholars, has been conducted. Methods of content analysis, comparative legal analysis, as well as approaches based on the analysis of crime data and legal impact measures, were used. The process of combating crime in Kazakhstan can be classified into several key areas: the digitalization of law enforcement agencies, tightening legislation, international cooperation, and the development of specialized units. The results of the study emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach that combines legal, social, and technological aspects. An important conclusion is the need for further improvement of preventive measures and the development of social programs aimed at reducing crime levels and increasing public trust in law enforcement agencies.

Annotation: The main problem addressed in the article is the limited effectiveness of human rights protection mechanisms in Kazakhstan, despite the presence of constitutional guarantees of citizens' rights and freedoms. The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan provides citizens with broad rights, but there is a significant gap between legal guarantees and their actual implementation in practice. The main issues include the insufficient independence of the judiciary, restrictions on freedom of expression, limited access to justice and legal aid for citizens, as well as difficulties faced by human rights organizations. These issues hinder the full realization of citizens' rights and freedoms, creating significant barriers to the functioning of the rule of law. The goal of the article is to analyze the human rights protection mechanisms enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and assess their impact on the protection of citizens' rights. The article aims to identify the main problems faced by citizens when protecting their rights and suggest possible solutions to improve the human rights situation in the country. To achieve the research goal, legal analysis of normative acts was used, including the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and other legislative acts regulating citizens' rights and freedoms. Judicial acts, reports of human rights organizations, and statistics related to citizens' appeals to state authorities and human rights structures were also used. The research methodology included comparative analysis and case studies, which allowed a deeper examination of the real problems in the implementation of human rights in Kazakhstan and the proposal of well-grounded solutions to address these issues. The research results showed that, despite the presence of constitutional guarantees of rights and freedoms, the real situation with human rights protection mechanisms in Kazakhstan remains problematic. The main problems include the insufficient independence of the judiciary, restrictions on freedom of expression, difficulties in accessing justice and legal aid, as well as administrative barriers for human rights organizations. These factors limit the effective realization of citizens' rights and undermine trust in the judiciary and state authorities. The task of reforming the judicial system, improving the accessibility of legal aid, and creating conditions for the free operation of human rights organizations is of critical importance for enhancing human rights protection, strengthening democracy, and the rule of law, as well as for creating a fairer and more effective human rights protection system in Kazakhstan.